Thursday, June 16, 2011

backless wedding gowns

images white ackless bridal gown backless wedding gowns. Backless Wedding Dress
  • Backless Wedding Dress

  • pappu
    11-30 01:16 AM
    thanks for the responses on this thread. Can one of you take the responsibility of contacting everyone and organizing the conference call? In the confrence call everyone can introduce themselves, discuss ideas and action items to work on.

    wallpaper Backless Wedding Dress backless wedding gowns. ruffle halter ridal gown
  • ruffle halter ridal gown

  • nixstor
    07-05 01:00 PM
    Assume you make it paid. Then what. We will have maximum 400-500 users and you want to go and lobby or fight with congress with that much number of users. I still do not understand why this thread is still active. Well my post is going to bump it up so I'll not respond to this post any more. Lets focus on other drives as suggested by pappu. We are just waiting too much time discussing fruitile things.

    Lets do some quick math here. Assuming that we have 500 guys who are paying. you make IV paid. You will have alteast another 200 guys who will realize the importance of IV and join. People have come to IV time and over when ever shyt has hit the roof and they will come.

    700 is better or 500 with a boat load of people who are just hovering around is better?

    backless wedding gowns. 2011 New Backless Wedding
  • 2011 New Backless Wedding

  • empee99
    09-27 12:51 PM
    you dont have to do anything. Based on your L2 petition you will get an I-94
    valid till 2009. Since your EAD is unexpired, you can continue working once you come back. EAD is authorization to work, completely unrelated to your travel to India and back. What exactly are you worried about?

    I am worried bcoz, on my EAD card its written "NOT VALID FOR REENTRY TO U.S."

    what does this mean?

    Please advise.

    2011 ruffle halter ridal gown backless wedding gowns. ackless wedding dresses style
  • ackless wedding dresses style

  • abhijitp
    07-25 01:27 AM
    Your lawyers are not adding the employment letter because they are working in the ineterst of your HR department and not in your interest. Your HR thinks that after 180 days you will leave the job. So in order to retain you, they are filing incomplete application to invoke an RFE or rejection and keep things iin their control. Hope you are smart enough to see the games people are playing with your greencard application.
    Yes, I have this feeling already. Now, what happens if someone switches jobs using AC-21 and then this RFE is received? You have to submit the NEW employment / offer letter right? So how does this help the current employer to stop you from switching jobs?


    backless wedding gowns. Modern Wedding Dress Backless
  • Modern Wedding Dress Backless

  • grinch
    02-27 08:45 PM
    You can also use Mental Rey, and check the "final gather" option. Make sure when you use it you set the rays down to like 10 or 20, or it'll take forever to render.
    This will actually make all objects emit a certain amount of light depending on their brightness. For example, a stone wall will not make any noticeable light, but a bright white ball (a light bulb) will act as a omni light. I use this in almost all my renders to achieve a more realistic scene.

    That shader glow thing isn't what he wants I think. To add it though, open the attributes of the material, and under the special effects menu you just increase the value from 0. That does not make the object a light though, it adds a glow to the object in post (after the render), and so it does no make any actual light. .... i might be thinking of some other glow thing, soulty's way might work as well

    I will start my subway soon guys! I love the entries so far! Keep it up!


    yeah I've known about the glow effect, and thats not exactly what I'm trying to acheive. But thanks for the mental ray technique, I'm gonna try it!

    backless wedding gowns. ackless wedding dresses style
  • ackless wedding dresses style

  • greencard_fever
    07-28 05:08 PM
    only a fool of the nth order can say that india will benefit from this nuclear treaty!

    I am not saying that India will be benefit from with this N-deal. I was said if so then how? read it the way i don’t have any info on this deal and looks like you have more info. can you please tell me and other IV members who is not aware of this deal that how India will not get the benefit and how bad it will effect our great nations growing economy and Nuclear power?


    backless wedding gowns. ackless wedding dresses
  • ackless wedding dresses

  • chintu25
    09-10 10:45 AM
    You can view the proceeding live at

    2010 2011 New Backless Wedding backless wedding gowns. white ackless bridal gown
  • white ackless bridal gown

  • varshadas
    12-19 09:26 AM
    Conference Details

    Date: Wednesday, December 20, 2006
    Start Time: 9:00 PM Eastern Std Time
    End Time: 10:55 PM Eastern Std Time
    Participants: 25
    Type of Conference Web-Scheduled Standard
    Dial-in Number: 1-605-725-1900 (South Dakota)
    Organizer Access Code: *938581 (you must include the leading star key)
    Participant Access Code 22558


    backless wedding gowns. ackless wedding gown
  • ackless wedding gown

  • rockstart
    03-14 11:34 AM
    EAD renewal delays will be on of the single issue on which I would defer AC-21 till I can find some one willing for an H1 transfer.

    hair ackless wedding dresses style backless wedding gowns. ackless wedding dress
  • ackless wedding dress

  • GCBy3000
    01-16 10:10 AM
    I have already signed up through my bank to send $20 everymonth to IV. It will also have memo with my name gcby3000.

    So you can count me against $20.


    backless wedding gowns. Ca0120 Halter Backless Wedding
  • Ca0120 Halter Backless Wedding

  • tikka
    07-25 09:40 AM
    WHEN: Wednesday �AUGUST 1st
    LOCATION- 48th and Park Avenue
    TIME: 7 pm

    CT FOLKS- Grand Central is a few blocks away. Naveen handle on IV (tnite)will be coming from CT so please send him a PM.

    NJ/NYC: Take E, V to 5th avenue and 53rd street and then you have to walk a few blocks!

    Let's meet up and get to know each other. It would be great if you can make it!!


    Thank you and enjoy the week!

    hot Modern Wedding Dress Backless backless wedding gowns. ackless wedding dress HQ
  • ackless wedding dress HQ

  • days_go_by
    11-20 10:49 PM
    I agree with you. Only sick ppl are frustrated with delay in GC.
    I think there are more than 6500 people here who are suffering from this disease then, about time we find a cure for it?


    house ackless wedding gown with backless wedding gowns. chiffon ackless wedding
  • chiffon ackless wedding

  • rodnyb
    02-12 08:53 AM
    My understanding is that they wasted over 300K from till 2005
    See my post
    their own statistics

    They haven't wasted too much since 2007, at least for EB. There might be some rounding errors (a few thousand) as they got visa number but the case denied or applicants gave up. Not sure CIS or DoS can issue more (say 5%) number to move PD to eliminate the problem.

    tattoo ackless wedding dresses style backless wedding gowns. Backless Wedding Dresses
  • Backless Wedding Dresses

  • Openarms
    08-11 02:15 PM
    Count me in for contribution up to $500 towards lobbying.

    I am not against any category ..... just wanna be reasonable.
    Couple of years back some organizations pushed / lobbied an idea that software engineers (typically fall into EB2) are more valuable then Programmer Analysts (typically fall into EB3).
    In those hay days who knows that they would come up with this unjustifiable idea...That may be true these days.


    pictures ackless wedding dresses backless wedding gowns. ackless wedding dress.
  • ackless wedding dress.

  • Anu119
    01-11 11:36 AM
    I just joined the chapter.
    Would love to be able to volnteer my services to this cause. How can I help? Also it may be a good idea to start a local support group for those of us in line waiting for this immigration hell to be over...may be a get together of some sort....

    Wishin' for a better future ahead for all us immigration victims
    PD for self: August 03
    Labor Cert: pending

    PD for husband: Dec 03
    Labor Cert & I-140: appoved.

    dresses ackless wedding dress HQ backless wedding gowns. ackless wedding dress
  • ackless wedding dress

  • drirshad
    07-01 09:08 AM
    AILA attorney message confirmation:

    Posted by alexberd (lawyer) 29 Jun 2007 1:18pm PST
    Potential Retrogression - news from AILA:

    On Monday or Tuesday of next week, State Department plans to issue a revised Visa Bulletin for July 2007. This revised Bulletin would retrogress some or all of the employment-based categories, very likely to the point of unavailable. Reports from AILA members about unusual levels and types of activities by USCIS indicate a particular push to adjudicate employment-based adjustments currently in the pipeline so as to exhaust visa numbers for fiscal year 2007.

    This follows the actions of USCIS in June, when it began rejecting EB-3 "Other Worker" adjustment applications even though the Visa Bulletin showed an October 2001 cut-off date, on the basis that the "Other Worker" numbers for the year had been exhausted.

    Alex Berd, Esq.
    AILA Member
    Berd & Klauss, PLLC
    44 Wall Street
    New York, NY 10005
    Ph: (212) 380-1291
    Fax: (212) 461-7153
    Skype: alex.berd


    makeup ackless wedding gown backless wedding gowns. ackless wedding gown with
  • ackless wedding gown with

  • Legal
    07-20 10:38 PM
    I'm having less and less faith in the claims made by members that USCIS is inefficient and clueless. ok, they have been and continue to be in many areas:):). However, they have a game plan this time. In retrospect, we know they had a game plan in June 07 also.

    There are several unknown variables (repeatedly and extensively discussed here)which make accurate prediction impossible for us. However, USCIS has the numbers of RIPE CASES. And they moved the dates based on the availability of remaining GC numbers for this fiscal AND the ripe cases.

    They could have moved it to just Dec 2005, instead they moved it all the way to June 2006.

    Best\ optimistic scenario- Most EB-2-I cases upto June 2006 will be adjudicated before Oct 1st.

    Conservative scenario-Upto at least Dec 2005 PD all cases will be adjudicated , and a few CP cases into early 2006 will be adjudicated. With spillovers happening in each quarter, the PD should continue to move.

    girlfriend Backless Wedding Dresses backless wedding gowns. Backless Wedding Dresses
  • Backless Wedding Dresses

  • Ramba
    07-04 07:25 PM
    Everyone blaming CIS/DOS needs to understand some basics behind this mess. Before going to conclude anything, first, one should read all the ombudsman reports for last 3 or 4 years. Former INS or current USCIS�s functions and operations were not questionable and not known to public till ombudsman office was established. Ombudsman has helped customers and keep helping to improve efficiency of CIS. Ombudsman main concern (or goal) have been over the 4 years are

    1. Primarily reducing backlogs in any application type particularly 485 and timely approval of any application.

    2. Abolish the need for interim benefits like EAD, AP etc. If they approve 485 in 6 months, then most of us do not require EAD and AP.

    3. Reduce the wastage of EB visas, as unused EB visas can not be carried over to next year (use it or lose it). Since 1992, about 200,000 EB visas were lost permanently. In 2003 alone, they issued only 64,000 EB visas and lost 88,000.

    The recent report to congress, the ombudsman scolded the CIS left and right for its inefficiency and highlighted how many EB visas were lost for ever, in last 10 years despite the very heavy demand for employment based green cards. Based on his report, both CIS and DOS try to obey the direction of ombudsman and modifying the 485 adjudication procedure. The reason for loss of EB visas in previous years not only due to inefficiency in processing the 485s on time, it is also due to lengthy background check delay by FBI, where USCIS has no control. For example, in 2003 they could approve about 64,000 485s only. It is partially due to USCIS inefficiency and partially due to lengthy FBI check. There are 300,000 (AOS+ Naturalization applicants) cases are pending with FBI for name check. Out of which, about 70,000 cases are pending more than 2 years. Out of 300,000 victims of name check delay, how many are really threat to the country? Perhaps none or may be few! Remember that lot of Indians also victims of name check and all the victims of name check delay already living in USA.

    The big problem is the timing when USCIS takes the visa number for a 485 applicant. Till 1982, INS took visa number for a 485 applicant as soon as they receive the application. Visa number assigned to a 485 applicant without processing his/her application. He/She may not be a qualified applicant to approve 485. Still they assign to them. If they found, the applicant is ineligible, they suppose to return the number back to DOS. However, this practice was modified after 1982. USCIS is taking visa number only at the time of approval of 485, after processing the 485 for a lengthy period. For some people, particularly victims of name check, 485 processing time vary between 2 to 5 years. Though, it is a good practice it is not the ideal or efficient process, due to name check delay. Let us assume about 150,000 are victim of name check in 2003. If they assigned all the numbers to these 150,000 applicants at the time they filed 485, the 88,000 visa numbers might have not been lost in 2003. Now what happens, those who filed 485 in 2003 (victim of name check delay) will take EB numbers from 2007 or 2008 quota, if FBI clears his/her file in 2007 or 2008. This will push back those who are going to file 485 in 2007 or 2008.

    That why, ombudsman in his 2007 yearly report to Congress recommended to practice the old way of assigning visa number to 485 applicants, to minimize the loss of visa numbers.

    Now lets come to July Visa bulletin mess.

    Because of tight holding of visa cutoff dates for EB3 and EB2 for the first 8 months of 2007 (From Oct 2006 to May 2007) USCIS approved only 66,000 485s. For the next 4 months they have about 60K to 70K numbers available. If they approve the pending 485s with slower speed or old cut off dates, there is a potential estimated loss of 40,000 EB visas by Sep 2007. Thats why, based on ombudsman recommendation, DOS moved considerably the cut off date for June. When they took inventory in May, there are about 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications were pending due to non-availability of visa numbers. The �documentarily qualified 485 applications� mean the application filed long time back and processed by USCIS and cleared the FBI name and criminal check, and found eligible for green card. Apart from 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications, there is thousands of 485 applications (documentarily not yet qualified) pending due to name check. When DOS checked with USCIS they found only 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications (in all EB categories put together) are pending. However, the available visas are more than 40,000 (60to 70K). Then they made with out consulting properly with USCIS they made �current� for all EB categories. This is how they determine �current� or �over-subscribed� and how they establish cutoff dates.

     If there are sufficient numbers in a particular category to satisfy all reported documentarily qualified demand, the category is considered �Current.�

     Whenever the total of documentarily qualified applicants in a category exceeds the supply of numbers available for allotment for the particular month, the category is considered to be �oversubscribed� and a visa availability cut-off date is established.

    There is nothing wrong with DOS to make all categories �current� for a July bulletin as per they definition of demand vs supply estimation to meet the numerical limitations per year. Perhaps the DOS did not aware of other impact of making all categories �current� ie fresh guys entering into I-485 race. Because of �current� there will be additional tons and tons of new filings. The rough estimation is about 500K to 700K new 485s and same amount of EAD and AP applications will be filed in July. But the available number is just 60K, and there are already 40K documentarily qualified 485s are pending more than 6 months to 3 years to take the numbers from remaining 60K pool. That leaves just 20K to fresh 485 filings. If 700K new 485 filed in July, it will choke the system. People have to live only in EAD and AP for next 5 to 10 years.

    For example, an EB3-Indian whose LC approved through fast PERM on July 30th 2007, can apply 140 and 485 on July 31st 2007 as per July visa bulletin. For his PD, it will take another 10 years for the approval of 485. During this 10 year period, he/she has to live in EAD and AP and need to go for finger print every 15 month.

    Therefore by making �current� for all EB categories is a billion dollar mistake by both DOS and CIS first part.. Another mistake is timing of rectifying mistake. USCIS and DOS and law firms should have discussed immediately about the potential chaos about making current and rectified move the cut-off to reasonable period to accommodate additional 20K 485s. If they modified the VB, with in couple of days after July 13, then there wont be a this much stress, time and wastage of money.

    There is nothing wrong in issuing additional advisory notice or modified visa bulletin to control the usage of visa numbers. The only mistake both USCIS and DOS is made is the timing of issuance of modified visa bulletin or advisory notice. It indicates poor transparency in the system and bad customer service. Now, they used all 140K visas this year. Assigning remaining 20K visa numbers to already pending 485s which are not yet documentarily (name check delayed cases) qualified is not the violation of law. It was old practice. In fact, ombudsman recommends it. They have the trump card which is Ombudsman report and recommendations. Therefore they are immune to lawsuit. Therefore, filing the law-suit is not going to help. The only two mistakes I see is 1) making all categories as �current� in June 13 and second is modifying VB only on July 2.

    My recommendation is to IV is capitalize the situation in constructive way. Law suit only bring media attention with the expense of money and time. The constructive approach is getting an immediate interim relief by legislation to recapture unused visas in previous years to balance the supply vs demand difference.

    hairstyles Ca0120 Halter Backless Wedding backless wedding gowns. ackless wedding dress
  • ackless wedding dress

  • grinch
    02-26 02:54 PM
    Hey guys!

    I'm finally back from the beautiful Italy, and I'm ready to start getting back into the battle!

    March 10th sounds pretty good, yet I just might need a couple days or so, depending on how my time goes.

    and soulty, your not going to participate?! Aw hoe come man! I was looking forward to your entry!

    I'm still working hard, almost done!

    07-18 08:03 PM

    06-10 07:49 PM
    Done - sent to Alabama senators

    No comments:

    Post a Comment