Saturday, June 18, 2011

chicago bulls derrick rose dunking

images chicago bulls derrick rose chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • vparam
    10-29 12:27 PM
    Not wrong in hoping right :-)

    wallpaper chicago bulls derrick rose chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. Tags: Chicago Bulls, derrick
  • Tags: Chicago Bulls, derrick

  • pappu
    12-27 08:56 AM
    Here is the link where I posted in Chinese link where I posted in Chinese
    Thank you very much. pls help us further by posting in various other chineese websites. We want this organization to have more members from other nationalities.

    chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • StarSun
    02-04 09:58 AM
    Members who want to donate air miles, please come forward, as it will allow for others who are considering to come a chance to plan for the event.

    2011 Tags: Chicago Bulls, derrick chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. Chicago Bulls Derrick Rose
  • Chicago Bulls Derrick Rose

  • larun
    06-12 08:36 AM


    chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • frostrated
    07-13 08:37 AM
    Do any of you think that the dates will move forward next month? Looking at the backlog numbers published by USCIS, I think they moved as far as they could to make use of all the available visas. I am thinking that the move next month might be only a few days or a month at the max. USCIS mentioned last month that we could expect the dates to be March/April 06 at the end of this fiscal year. Will this mean that EB2I will hold out at March / April 06 for the next fiscal year?

    chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. Derrick Rose #1 of the Chicago
  • Derrick Rose #1 of the Chicago

  • feedfront
    09-17 03:37 PM
    When they issue RFE, does the case status online shows Card/Document production?.

    My online status still shows 'Request For Evidence'. In one way, it is less disturbing than yours. Good Luck!


    chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • vagish
    04-04 02:40 PM
    It is true. But either Corporate America or Lawyers does not want to address the issues raised by Unions or anti immigrants. They want free ride and does not care about working class. No bold leadership in congress to address both sides issues. Congress members are siding with any one of two groups. Everyone knows that compromise will easily pass. But compromise will not give free ride to any group. Basically moderate H1b and GC increase with protection to US workers without wage pressurw will get most of the congress support. Even with illegal immigration also it is easy to pass if they give citizenship to existing people and allow more workers with complete protection to US workers without wage pressure will get most of congress support.
    the reason why Mccain and kennedy partnership failed, because kennedy wanted to put the fair wage clause into the bill so that futurue employees can
    atleast get the prevaling wages( it makes sense logically ), but republican Mccain didn't like it because they want employer to pay what ever they feel like,
    if that happens you will see that in future the quota for low wage workers will also get filled in one day as we saw with H1B's yesterday, and then even 400000 for semiskilled workers would not be enough.

    Iam not saying H1B get paid less, but there is lot of abuse going on,
    1500000 application just on aptil 2 tell you a lot of things, no matter how much demand is there, it is outrageous.

    when american people see that corporate america wants quota less h1B , they going to be on the streets just like illigals were last year.


    2010 chicago bulls derrick rose chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • gcisadawg
    03-09 06:40 PM
    I am tired of words "Something is Cooking". All I care now is cooked food - whatever is cooking.

    u bet! :D


    chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • ashwin_27
    07-01 03:47 PM
    I think the new reference # for the Sanders Amendment is now
    Senate Amendment 4439 to the American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act (H.R. 5297).. Correct??

    People will be sending emails to senators with reference to the wrong amendment if this text is not corrected!!

    hair Chicago Bulls Derrick Rose chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • TomPlate
    03-10 09:00 AM
    Assume AC21 is not filed. But we change job and location, so do we need to do only address change alone. Please let me know?


    chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. Bulls Derrick Rose#39;s Amazing
  • Bulls Derrick Rose#39;s Amazing

  • green_card
    07-05 12:56 AM
    if there is enough of a stink made over this, the law could be changed to get back the 'lost' numbers.... laws are there to cater to needs of the situation at hand anc can be changed. IV, AILA and the ombudsman are doing a great job in helping bring about a change in the law. even if congress decides to allow reclaiming of the numbers lost since 1992, there could be an end to this problem for the forseeable future until SKIL or another version of "the grand bargain" comes to the table.

    I applied for 140/485 concurrently in August 2004 before IV existed. I can tell you first hand that IV has made a HUGE difference. Our voice is being heard above the din of mostly bigoted and ignorant comments by right wing radicals and liberals that only care about illegals/unskilled workers.

    I am sick of the narrow minded comments of a lot of people that post here that only care about their particular scenario and dont take the bigger picture into account. We are all in this together and we will succeed only as a combined front and not as bickering individuals.

    All the IV core members, thanks for everything

    hot chicago bulls derrick rose chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • feedfront
    10-07 12:27 PM
    Received email about change in status to 'Your Case Status: Request for Evidence Response Review'. USCIS should have received it yesterday and today it changed to response review.

    RFE email: Sept 10, 2010
    RFE received by attorney: Sept 21, 2010 [Civil Surgeon was not in current list of authorised civil surgeon + x-ray report was missing]
    Reponse to RFE sent on : Oct 05, 2010 via USPS
    Soft LUD/email: Oct 07, 2010 @10.30PM PST [Your Case Status: Request for Evidence Response Review]


    house chicago bulls derrick rose chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • bigboy007
    07-18 12:34 PM
    i think we need to wait till a week more and then give a call back to USCIS just to make sure , as per my understanding and my lawyers info none were rejected and they will be accepted.

    tattoo Derrick Rose #1 of the Chicago chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. Derrick Rose #1 of the Chicago
  • Derrick Rose #1 of the Chicago

  • abstractvision
    03-19 09:02 PM
    Lets review this whole page. Assumptions...and inferences...not sure how many are true and helpful. I will abstain from commenting anything.


    pictures chicago bulls derrick rose chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. Chicago Bulls Derrick Rose
  • Chicago Bulls Derrick Rose

  • ncrtpMay2004
    09-09 02:13 PM
    You know it takes serious $$$ to get anything moving.
    Please consider $50/month level.

    dresses chicago bulls derrick rose chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • sushilup
    07-11 12:49 PM
    issue one year EAD and milk more money


    07/11/2008: Indian EB-2 Visa Number in Visa Bulletin August 2008 and Anticipated Expedited Adjudication of Their I-485 Applications to Prevent EB 2008 Visa Number Waste

    The movement of the EB-2 visa numbers for Indians is indeed a very good news in that it sounds that the USCIS intends to take out the visa numbers for them before the end of September 2008 as best as they can and attempt to adjudicate the applications before the new fiscal year starts on October 1, 2008. Obviously, there must be a large number of EB-2 cases which were filed during the July 2007 Visa Bulletin fiasco whose priority date is June 1, 2006 or earlier date. It appears that the USCIS has been working hard to get these cases ready for adjudication while their visa numbers are availalbe so that the agency prevents the visa number for FY 2008 from being wasted. Please stay tuned to this web site for this remarkable turn of the events.


    makeup chicago bulls derrick rose chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • PresidentO
    02-03 05:07 PM
    So naive of you to think that Senator-elect (Is she sworn in yet?) Gillibrand would be the person to do this. She is already labeled a flip flopper for courting hispanic groups.

    AFAIK, The 8 year wait time she was referring to was not EB wait times. That was posted here on IV, discussed and proved that she was talking in general. Actions speak louder than talk. Talk is free, action is risk for politicians.

    Good luck!

    girlfriend Derrick Rose #1 of the Chicago chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. chicago bulls derrick rose
  • chicago bulls derrick rose

  • addsf345
    12-10 07:50 PM
    I absolutely agree with you. I can't imagine how a person of Indian or Chinese origin can blame themselves of this retrogression. To me, it is a reflection of poor self esteem.
    The bottomline is that we are here because we are needed here. We have the privilege to apply for green card in return for the work we do. Country quota does not make sense in employment based immigration. It is an unfair practice which has to stop someday.

    very good point. Such low-esteemed people will start blaming their parents for retrogression. Why they gave them birth in first place. If they wouldn't have been born, no retrogression. See its EZ!

    hairstyles Bulls Derrick Rose#39;s Amazing chicago bulls derrick rose dunking. Derrick Rose Dunk VS Brad
  • Derrick Rose Dunk VS Brad

  • gc28262
    04-11 02:07 PM
    And you inferred this from EB3 Mexico becoming Unavailable in month of May.

    This was not inferred from Mexico EB3. I was explaining why EB3 Mexico became unavailable. Any category becoming U is nothing alarming. It just means there are no more visas available for that category for that year.

    As for April 2001, it is the dreaded date for EB3-I India. The reason being all 245(i) applicants had a PD of April-2001 or earlier. If you haven't read 245(i) and its impact on EB3-I, please educate yourself regarding 245(i).

    01-25 01:00 PM
    For my part, I send an email everyday to the white house and the state dept. This is probably not enough.....but may be some day it will work.

    BTW, my apologies if the members thought that this thread was accusatory. Still the question remains, what next?

    Ok, I understand, no use bringing it up again, sorry, let me go back and read other interesting threads on "investments" and "buying houses"...

    This is as per my experience and talking to people who know about letter writing.
    Are you sending these emails with your name, address etc from a genuine email ID? Try sending it from your office ID if you are serious.
    Otherwise all your emails are getting deleted by the spam fileter and you are wasting your energy, time.

    I came to this site while searching on Google to read about investments and buying houses kind of topic and I think those are good threads. They help us increase our knowlege and help in real life in the life of an immigrant waiting for greencard. Most people after getting EAD do not eally care about Greencard like you but care about these issues more. Green card will come anyways for them, sooner or later. You cannot keep discussing about Immigration all the time. Such threads add interest to the site. Who is interested in reading threads like Stamping in Tijuana, H1B denied, Got no FP notice Please help Urgent, etc

    07-04 08:03 PM

    I agree with you 100 % , I believe having excessive media coverage and lawsuits , would bring the GC number and process in the open , and most americans would oppose the GC as they oppose H1B.

    If i was a american i would surely be happy with USCIS/DOS creating so much trouble for the immigrants to my country , who i believe are taking my job.

    Everyone blaming CIS/DOS needs to understand some basics behind this mess. Before going to conclude anything, first, one should read all the ombudsman reports for last 3 or 4 years. Former INS or current USCIS�s functions and operations were not questionable and not known to public till ombudsman office was established. Ombudsman has helped customers and keep helping to improve efficiency of CIS. Ombudsman main concern (or goal) have been over the 4 years are

    1. Primarily reducing backlogs in any application type particularly 485 and timely approval of any application.

    2. Abolish the need for interim benefits like EAD, AP etc. If they approve 485 in 6 months, then most of us do not require EAD and AP.

    3. Reduce the wastage of EB visas, as unused EB visas can not be carried over to next year (use it or lose it). Since 1992, about 200,000 EB visas were lost permanently. In 2003 alone, they issued only 64,000 EB visas and lost 88,000.

    The recent report to congress, the ombudsman scolded the CIS left and right for its inefficiency and highlighted how many EB visas were lost for ever, in last 10 years despite the very heavy demand for employment based green cards. Based on his report, both CIS and DOS try to obey the direction of ombudsman and modifying the 485 adjudication procedure. The reason for loss of EB visas in previous years not only due to inefficiency in processing the 485s on time, it is also due to lengthy background check delay by FBI, where USCIS has no control. For example, in 2003 they could approve about 64,000 485s only. It is partially due to USCIS inefficiency and partially due to lengthy FBI check. There are 300,000 (AOS+ Naturalization applicants) cases are pending with FBI for name check. Out of which, about 70,000 cases are pending more than 2 years. Out of 300,000 victims of name check delay, how many are really threat to the country? Perhaps none or may be few! Remember that lot of Indians also victims of name check and all the victims of name check delay already living in USA.

    The big problem is the timing when USCIS takes the visa number for a 485 applicant. Till 1982, INS took visa number for a 485 applicant as soon as they receive the application. Visa number assigned to a 485 applicant without processing his/her application. He/She may not be a qualified applicant to approve 485. Still they assign to them. If they found, the applicant is ineligible, they suppose to return the number back to DOS. However, this practice was modified after 1982. USCIS is taking visa number only at the time of approval of 485, after processing the 485 for a lengthy period. For some people, particularly victims of name check, 485 processing time vary between 2 to 5 years. Though, it is a good practice it is not the ideal or efficient process, due to name check delay. Let us assume about 150,000 are victim of name check in 2003. If they assigned all the numbers to these 150,000 applicants at the time they filed 485, the 88,000 visa numbers might have not been lost in 2003. Now what happens, those who filed 485 in 2003 (victim of name check delay) will take EB numbers from 2007 or 2008 quota, if FBI clears his/her file in 2007 or 2008. This will push back those who are going to file 485 in 2007 or 2008.

    That why, ombudsman in his 2007 yearly report to Congress recommended to practice the old way of assigning visa number to 485 applicants, to minimize the loss of visa numbers.

    Now lets come to July Visa bulletin mess.

    Because of tight holding of visa cutoff dates for EB3 and EB2 for the first 8 months of 2007 (From Oct 2006 to May 2007) USCIS approved only 66,000 485s. For the next 4 months they have about 60K to 70K numbers available. If they approve the pending 485s with slower speed or old cut off dates, there is a potential estimated loss of 40,000 EB visas by Sep 2007. Thats why, based on ombudsman recommendation, DOS moved considerably the cut off date for June. When they took inventory in May, there are about 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications were pending due to non-availability of visa numbers. The �documentarily qualified 485 applications� mean the application filed long time back and processed by USCIS and cleared the FBI name and criminal check, and found eligible for green card. Apart from 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications, there is thousands of 485 applications (documentarily not yet qualified) pending due to name check. When DOS checked with USCIS they found only 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications (in all EB categories put together) are pending. However, the available visas are more than 40,000 (60to 70K). Then they made with out consulting properly with USCIS they made �current� for all EB categories. This is how they determine �current� or �over-subscribed� and how they establish cutoff dates.

     If there are sufficient numbers in a particular category to satisfy all reported documentarily qualified demand, the category is considered �Current.�

     Whenever the total of documentarily qualified applicants in a category exceeds the supply of numbers available for allotment for the particular month, the category is considered to be �oversubscribed� and a visa availability cut-off date is established.

    There is nothing wrong with DOS to make all categories �current� for a July bulletin as per they definition of demand vs supply estimation to meet the numerical limitations per year. Perhaps the DOS did not aware of other impact of making all categories �current� ie fresh guys entering into I-485 race. Because of �current� there will be additional tons and tons of new filings. The rough estimation is about 500K to 700K new 485s and same amount of EAD and AP applications will be filed in July. But the available number is just 60K, and there are already 40K documentarily qualified 485s are pending more than 6 months to 3 years to take the numbers from remaining 60K pool. That leaves just 20K to fresh 485 filings. If 700K new 485 filed in July, it will choke the system. People have to live only in EAD and AP for next 5 to 10 years.

    For example, an EB3-Indian whose LC approved through fast PERM on July 30th 2007, can apply 140 and 485 on July 31st 2007 as per July visa bulletin. For his PD, it will take another 10 years for the approval of 485. During this 10 year period, he/she has to live in EAD and AP and need to go for finger print every 15 month.

    Therefore by making �current� for all EB categories is a billion dollar mistake by both DOS and CIS first part.. Another mistake is timing of rectifying mistake. USCIS and DOS and law firms should have discussed immediately about the potential chaos about making current and rectified move the cut-off to reasonable period to accommodate additional 20K 485s. If they modified the VB, with in couple of days after July 13, then there wont be a this much stress, time and wastage of money.

    There is nothing wrong in issuing additional advisory notice or modified visa bulletin to control the usage of visa numbers. The only mistake both USCIS and DOS is made is the timing of issuance of modified visa bulletin or advisory notice. It indicates poor transparency in the system and bad customer service. Now, they used all 140K visas this year. Assigning remaining 20K visa numbers to already pending 485s which are not yet documentarily (name check delayed cases) qualified is not the violation of law. It was old practice. In fact, ombudsman recommends it. They have the trump card which is Ombudsman report and recommendations. Therefore they are immune to lawsuit. Therefore, filing the law-suit is not going to help. The only two mistakes I see is 1) making all categories as �current� in June 13 and second is modifying VB only on July 2.

    My recommendation is to IV is capitalize the situation in constructive way. Law suit only bring media attention with the expense of money and time. The constructive approach is getting an immediate interim relief by legislation to recapture unused visas in previous years to balance the supply vs demand difference.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment